|
1
|
- L. D. Alford
- Engineer, Test Pilot, Author
- www.lionelalford.com
- www.ldalford.com
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
- The Second Mission
- Centurion
- Aegypt
- The End of Honor
- The Fox’s Honor
- A Season of Honor
- $15 each, $40 for set
|
|
4
|
- Historical Fiction looks to the past for understanding
- Science Fiction looks to the future for understanding
- Technology drives the future
|
|
5
|
- If we can predict the future of technology, we can predict the future of
the world
|
|
6
|
- 1. Introduction and approach
- 2. Transportation
- 3. Computers
- 4. Medicine
- 5. Energy
- 6. Exploration
- 7. Military
- 8. Conclusions
|
|
7
|
- 1. Current technology review
- 2. Directions
- 3. 10 years
- 4. 100 years
- 5. 1000 years
- 6. 10,000 years
- 7. Summary
- 8. Conclusion
|
|
8
|
- So this is what we will do
- 1. Look at needs
- 2. Assume everything is possible
in its time
- 3. Look at the past to see the
future
- 4. Look for the simplest
solution
|
|
9
|
- Warfare
- Survival
- Hegemony = survival
- New resources = survival
- Expansion = hegemony = survival
- More than true in the ancient world
|
|
10
|
- Warfare drove technology
- Warfare drove history
- History of the ancient world is warfare
- Why?
|
|
11
|
- Purpose of human culture and society?
- Protection
- Might makes right
- You only own what you can protect
- You only protect those things that you are willing to die for
- Culture and society allows people to bond together to protect
themselves and property
|
|
12
|
- Purpose of government
- Extension of culture and society for protection
- Military
- Governance – military leadership (kings)
- Laws – leadership (kings)
- Punishment – leadership
- Human political and governing bodies came out of the need for protection
|
|
13
|
- Protect what?
- Themselves
- Property – (wives, children, slaves, workers)
- Private property
- Culture/society/politics/nations/governance technological developments
driven by warfare
|
|
14
|
- Warfare drives technology
- Warfare drives society and culture
- Warfare is the means of survival
- Private property the point and the purpose
- Governance requires restriction of rights
- Military service restriction of rights
- Human experience until rise of markets
|
|
15
|
- Development of “rule of law” took power from few and applied to many
- Transformation in human culture
- “Rule of law” made markets possible
- Markets expand property from few to many
- Markets drive technology
- Markets and “rule of law” give power to humans beyond scope of “might
makes right”
|
|
16
|
- Military still necessary to
- Protect private property
- Ensure “rule of law”
- Protect markets
- Did I say protect private property
- Most private of property is self
- Everything else what you can make or purchase
- Life, liberty, pursuit of happiness
|
|
17
|
- Military in history began with infantry
- Stone age warfare
- Taking wives, children, slaves (much the same)
- Counting coop (honor as property)
- Taking property
- Usually not about land (can’t protect land as private property)
|
|
18
|
- Agrarianism changed everything
- Need to protect land (crops, implements, buildings)
- Need fast troops and transportation
- Garrison
- Growth in military
- Professional military – military leaders
|
|
19
|
- Professional military developed through need of garrison led directly to
kingdoms and empires
- Feudalism
- Experiments in governance
- Athenian democracy (all freemen fight)
- Roman republic (Legions, professional mil)
|
|
20
|
- Kings, right of kings, military leadership by an elite
- Makes sense in a survival culture
- Nutrition means
- Intelligence
- Energy
- Strength
- Beauty
- Reproduction
|
|
21
|
- Norm through most of human history until development of markets
- Markets pull you out of a survival economy
- No longer need for elite leadership if everyone has similar nutritional
advantages
- Feudalism progressed until the mercantilism and age of enlightenment
|
|
22
|
- Markets drive technology and not military
- Markets much more effective at technology
- Nations driven by market technology expanded militarily
- Britain
- France
- Dutch
- USA
- Germany and others
|
|
23
|
- Automobile and tractor preceded the tank
- Aircraft as a toy preceded the scout, fighter, and bomber
- In past military drove technology
- Civil war muskets norm when breach loading rifle had been in use since
(1836)
|
|
24
|
- Gattling guns as artillery
- Conscription – people’s war
- Professional military
|
|
25
|
- Constantly lagging market and technology
- Dependable technology
- Survival technology
- Combat multipliers
- Military development means
- Keeping stuff from your enemies
- Dependent on market
- Using technology in ways not previously imagined
- Impossible for military—dependent on market
|
|
26
|
- Threats – what do we face?
- Opportunities – what can we do?
|
|
27
|
- Hegemonic threats
- Local threats
|
|
28
|
- Can they destroy your nation or hegemony?
- China
- Russia
- European union
- India (potential)
- Reason
- Nucs
- WMDs in large enough amounts with sufficient military forces to capture
and control
|
|
29
|
- Terrorism
- Small governments that can affect hegemonic outreach
- Iran
- Iraq
- North Korea
- Pakistan
|
|
30
|
- Most important highest level
- Many solutions
- Primary is military
- High tech
- WMDs
- Defense capabilities
- High ground
- Hegemonic basing
- Rapid deployment, assault
|
|
31
|
- Low hegemonic danger
- Low threat
- Powerful military still effective
- Hegemonic outreach and power projection most effective
- Forward basing
- Fight to enemy
- High ground
- Power projection
|
|
32
|
- Markets drive military technology
- Necessary secrecy to maintain combat multipliers
- Restrictions on markets slow technological growth
- Government involvement slows growth
- Government is only source with $s and incentive for military technology
|
|
33
|
- Defense
- Offense
- Maneuver
- Transportation
- Supply
- Needs filled through technology
- Governments drive military - primary
- Markets drive military technology
|
|
34
|
- Threats
- Looked at past
- What will the future look like?
- Military technology necessary if you want to continue to protect
private property
- Only defense against hegemonic threats
- Major defense against local threats
|
|
35
|
- Nucs
- Biological warfare
- Chemical warfare
- Nondestructive weapons
- Smart weapons
- Cyber Warfare
- Future weapons
|
|
36
|
- Military can’t expand without government leadership
- Dependent on government involvement
- Assuming no more restrictions or regulations on the marketplace
|
|
37
|
- Nucs
- Need development
- Need dampers
- Need detectors
- Need interceptors
- Needs protection
- Will not get any of this unless it becomes an imperative of the
government
- Limited by weapons agreements—as long as our enemies are limiting (no
agreements with Russia or China)
|
|
38
|
- Biological and Chemical warfare
- No development
- Restricted by agreements (with USSR, EU)
- Need development to design defenses
|
|
39
|
- Nondestructive weapons
- Significant development
- Many NGOs attempting to restrict
- Types
- Sonic
- IR
- Microwave
- Visible light
- Chemical – not so much, tear gas
|
|
40
|
- Smart weapons
- Significant development
- Combat multiplier
- Using current technology to make more effective weapons
|
|
41
|
- Cyber Warfare
- Most fearful area
- No significant development
- Could shut down US economy and nation
- Most dangerous
- Market is driving somewhat
- Little government action
- All computer systems vulnerable
- Future weapons – who knows
|
|
42
|
- Military development dependent on perceived threat and government action
- Great threats
- Nucs
- Biological and Chemical
- Cyber Warfare
- Little action until…
|
|
43
|
- Could get rid of many threats with defensive technology
- Slow response by government
- Military will trail market technology and react (hopefully successfully
to military threats and actions)
- Smart technology development will continue to improve systems
|
|
44
|
- With development could counter
- Nucs
- Biological
- Chemical
- Cyber War
|
|
45
|
- Will counter
- New threats – of course
|
|
46
|
- Always new threats to counter
|
|
47
|
- Military
- 1. Looked at threats
- 2. Assumed everything is
possible in its time
- 3. Looked at the past to see the
future
- 4. Looked for the simplest
solution
|
|
48
|
- Survival the reason for warfare/military
- Purpose protection of private property
- Governments drive military
- Hegemony (power and survival) result of military
- Government involvement and leadership necessary (only powerful nations
survive)
|
|
49
|
- 1. Current technology review
- 2. Directions
- 3. 10 years
- 4. 100 years
- 5. 1000 years
- 6. 10,000 years
- 7. Summary
- 8. Conclusion
|
|
50
|
|