|
1
|
- Lecture 5 – Documents in Direct Support and Time: Heretical Gospels, Q,
and Apocryphal Works
|
|
2
|
- The Gospel According to Thomas
- The Gospel of Phillip
- The Second Treatise of the Great Seth
- Gospel of the Ebionites
- Gospel of Barnabas
- Gospel of Bartholomew
- Gospel of Judas
|
|
3
|
- Additional mentioned up to 400 AD
- None extant
- Gospel of the Twelve Apostles
- Gospel of Marcion
- Gospel of the Egyptians
- The False Gospel of Hesychius
- The False Gospels (published by Lucianus)
- The False Gospel of Peter
|
|
4
|
- Reconstructed based on Luke, Mark, Matthew
|
|
5
|
- Those I have called Apocryphal could potentially be considered Gospels
in the sense of OT Apocryphal literature and were in some degree
accepted by the Church
- Heretical works have been rejected since they were known and have strong
historical evidence against them
- In some cases literature is considered in both categories—they are
Apocryphal and Heretical
|
|
6
|
- Complete text discovered Nag Hammadi 1945, fragment Oxyrhynchus 1898
- Manuscripts: Greek 200 AD, Coptic 340 AD
- Written 50 AD or 100 AD (controversy)
- Didymos Judas Thomas author (not apostle)
- Could be primary or secondary
- Not Acts of Thomas, Infancy Gospel of Thomas, or Thomas the Contender
- 114 sayings of Christ
|
|
7
|
- Hippolytus and Origen (ca. 233) refer to a "Gospel of Thomas"
among the heterodox apocryphal gospels, unclear whether they mean the Infancy
Gospel of Thomas or this "sayings" Gospel of Thomas.
- 4th century, Cyril of Jerusalem mentioned "Gospel of Thomas" in his Cathechesis
V:
- "Let none read the gospel according to Thomas, for it is the work,
not of one of the twelve apostles, but of one of Mani's three wicked
disciples."
|
|
8
|
- Rejected by early church based on authorship and historical relevance
- Other bibliographical problems (1 manuscript, 1 fragment)
|
|
9
|
- Nag Hammadi Text
- Written 180-250 AD
- Manuscript written 4th century
- Number of manuscripts 1 Coptic
- Phillip identified as author
- Witness tertiary or none (cannot be 1° or 2°)
- Rejected by early church based on authorship and historical relevance
- Other bibliographical problems (1 manuscript)
|
|
10
|
- What is God?
"... Primordial Consciousness that dwells in the deepest and
the subtlest primary plane of the multidimensional Universe..."
- What is man?
"... Man is... consciousness, i.e. living energy, capable of
self-awareness and that possesses mind and memory...“
- The meaning of life
"The question of the meaning of one’s life gets inevitably
raised before any man who matures in his development..."
|
|
11
|
- Nag Hammadi Text
- Written 120-130 AD
- Manuscript written 4th century
- Number of manuscripts 1 Coptic
- Author believed to be Basilides
- Recognized Gnostic—started a Gnostic sect
- Rejected by early church based on authorship and historical relevance
- Mystic - Relates that Jesus did not die
- Gnostic heresy
- Other bibliographical problems (1 manuscript)
|
|
12
|
- Complete text discovered Nag Hammadi 1945
- Written Greek 100-160 AD
- Manuscript mid 2nd century
- Number of manuscripts 1 Greek
- Author unknown
- "The Gospel of the Ebionites gospel harmony preserved in a few
quotations in the writings of Epiphanius
- Original title is unknown
|
|
13
|
- Probably from Ebionites, Greek-speaking Jewish Christians during 2nd
and 3rd centuries
- Epiphanius alleges it is an abridged, truncated version of the Gospel
of Matthew
- Extant fragments a harmony of the Gospels Matthew, Luke, and possibly
Mark
- Irenaeus notes existence of gospel
- Problematic contents
- Omits infancy narratives
- John the Baptist and Jesus as vegetarians
- Polemic against the Jewish Temple (<70 AD)
|
|
14
|
- Renaissance manuscripts
- Written after 650 AD
- Manuscript written 16th century
- Number of manuscripts 2 (Italian, Spanish)
- Islamic document describing the life and origins of the Islamic Prophet
Jesus
- Notable internal and external issues
- Does contradict some Islamic beliefs
- Apostolic fathers never saw the document
|
|
15
|
- 26 page Codex discovered Egypt 1970
- Written 150 AD
- Manuscript written 300 AD
- Number of manuscripts 1 Coptic
- Judas Iscariot claimed author - impossible
- Rejected by early church based on authorship and historical relevance
- Other bibliographical problems (1 manuscript)
- External problems based on claimed author
|
|
16
|
- Late manuscripts
- Written after 300-500 AD
- Manuscript written 5th (6th or 7th)
century
- Number of manuscripts 3 (2 Greek, 1 Latin)
- Jerome notes number of apocryphal Gospels:
- According to Egyptians, Thomas, Matthias, Bartholomew, the Twelve,
Basilides, & Apelles
- Likely depends upon Origen
- Condemned in Gelasian Decree
- Dionysian writings two sentences quoted from 'the divine Bartholomew,‘
(questionable)
|
|
17
|
- Not Extant
- Written 80-150 AD
- Manuscript written N/A
- Number of manuscripts 0
- Mentioned by
- Hippolytus
- Epiphanius
- Clement of Alexandria – most citations
- Reference in Excerpts of Theodotus
- Used in Egypt in 2nd and 3rd centuries
|
|
18
|
- Not Extant
- Written 130-140 AD
- Manuscript written N/A
- Number of manuscripts 0
- Marcion author – cannot be 1° or 2°
- Anti-Semite
- Founder of Gnostic sect
- Taught god of the Old Testament not true God
- True and higher God revealed only in Jesus
- Wrote the Antitheses show differences between OT god and true God
|
|
19
|
- Marcion
- Excommunicated c. 144 AD
- Established sect, rivaled Church 2 centuries
- Established first explicit canon-included:
- The Euangelion, or the Gospel of the Lord
- The Apostolikon
- Ten epistles of Paul, not including the pastorals
- Marcion truncated Luke and Paul
- Derogatory references from contemporaries
- Justin Martyr
- Irenaeus of Lyons
|
|
20
|
- Not Extant
- Written 100-150 AD
- Manuscript written N/A
- Number of manuscripts 0
- Mentioned by Origen, Ambrose, Jerome, Philip of Side, Venerable Bede,
and Theophylactus
- Identified with Gospel of the Ebionites
- Fragments quoted by Epiphanius survive
- Synoptic type gospel
|
|
21
|
- Scholars before enlightenment marveled at similarity of Matthew, Mark,
and Luke
- Scholars since enlightenment wondered at
similarity
- Turbingen School scholars concluded Matthew and Luke are plagiarized
from Mark and another “sayings” Gospel – “Q”
- “Quella” means source in German (also Logia)
- Mark is a narrative-shares commonality with Matthew and Luke
- “Q” is a sayings Gospel
|
|
22
|
- No evidence of Q in history
- Chronology is dubious
- Of necessity would have to be written prior to Matthew and Luke - 50 to
75 AD
- Yet Mark may be a contemporary (or later than) Matthew and Luke - 65 to
70 AD
- Although plagiarism was common in ancient world, to put together or
rewrite a document so close to the source is unusual
|
|
23
|
- No accepted evidence from early church or Apostolic Fathers (or
Apostolic Heretics)
- Turbingen school, Schleiermacher in 1832 interpreted statement Papias
of Hierapolis, c. 125 AD
- "Matthew compiled the oracles (Greek: logia) of the Lord in a
Hebrew manner of speech.“
- Instead of traditional interpretation that Papias was referring to
Matthew’s style of writing, he divined Papias was actually meant a
sayings collection available to early Church
|
|
24
|
- Until Gospel of Thomas was discovered idea of Q was discounted by almost
every major scholar
- After Gospel of Thomas many have seen possibility of “sayings” Gospel Q
revived
- Problem is still evidence and witness
- No manuscript
- No evidence
- No witness
- More evidence for apocryphal/heretical works
|
|
25
|
- Most heretical and apocryphal early Christian writings have stronger
bibliographical evidence than other works in antiquity
- Bibliographical, internal, external issues
- In history, Q is a figment of the imagination
- All worth reading
- Points to Christ in history
- No two “reconstructed” Qs the same!
- Can clearly see why they are not on the same historical footing as the
Biblical Canon
|
|
26
|
- The Apocalypse of Peter
- The Gospel of the Birth of Mary
- The Epistles of Jesus Christ and Abgarus King of Edessa
- Secret Book of James
- Dialogue of the Savior
- Paul’s Epistle to the Laodiceans
- Paul’s Epistle to Seneca and Seneca’s Epistle to Paul
- The Acts of Paul and Thecla
|
|
27
|
- Letters of Pilate and Herod
- The Epistle of Pontius Pilate
- The Report of Pilate the Governor
- The Report of Pontius Pilate
- The Trial and Condemnation of Pilate
- The Death of Pilate
|
|
28
|
- Additional mentioned up to 400 AD
- None extant
- The Acts of Andrew
- The Writings of Bartholomew the Apostle
- The Revelation of Cerinthus
- An Epistle of Christ to Peter and Paul
- An Epistle of Christ
- A Hymn, which Christ taught his Disciples
- The Acts of the Apostles (Ebionites)
- The Book of the Helkesaites
|
|
29
|
- Additional mentioned up to 400 AD
- The Book of James
- The Acts of the Apostles by Leucius
- The Acts of the Apostles by Lentitus
- The Books of Lentitus
- The Acts under the Apostles’s Name by Leontius
- The Acts of the Apostles by Leuthon
- The Acts of the Apostles (Manichees)
- The Traditions of Matthias
|
|
30
|
- Additional mentioned up to 400 AD
- The Acts of Paul and Thecla
- The Acts of Paul
- The Preaching of Paul and Peter
- The Revelation of Paul
- The Acts of Peter
- The Doctrine of Peter
- The Judgment of Peter
- The Preaching of Peter
- The Revelation of Peter
|
|
31
|
- Additional mentioned up to 400 AD
- The Acts of Philip
- The Acts of the Apostles by Seleucus
- The Revelation of Stephan
- The Catholic Epistle of Themison the Montanist
- The Acts of Thomas
|
|
32
|
- Akhmim fragment 1887
- Written 175-200 AD
- Manuscript written 8th or 9th century
- Number of manuscripts 1 Greek 1 Ethiopic
- Peter identified as author
- Witness tertiary or none (cannot be 1° or 2°)
- Rejected by early church based on authorship and historical relevance
- Bibliographical problems
- Contains 4 Esther (written 100 AD)
|
|
33
|
- The Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew
- Edited version of Protevangelion of James and the Infancy Gospel of
Thomas
- Written 140-170 (150) AD
- Earliest Manuscript written 350 AD
- Number of manuscripts 130 various
- Matthew identified as author
- Based on other works (cannot be 1° or 2°)
- Rejected by early church based on authorship and historical issues
- (First reference to ox and ass at the manger)
|
|
34
|
- Abgarus V of Edessa 13-50 AD
- Supposed letters between Abgarus and Christ
- Discovered 4th century Eusebius (325 AD)
- Letters likely fabricated 3rd century
- Abgar IX of Osroene fabricated to legitimize rule
- Written 3rd century AD
- Earliest Manuscript written 4th century AD
- Number of manuscripts few various
- Not mentioned in any ancient source
- Not in any list of NT documents
- No mention prior to Eusebius
|
|
35
|
- Apocryphon of James – sayings document
- Nag Hammadi Codex III
- Written 100-150 AD
- Manuscript written 4th century
- Number of manuscripts 1 Coptic
- James identified as author
- Witness tertiary or none (too late for 1° or 2°)
- Rejected by early church based on authorship and historical relevance
- Gnostic mysticism
- Internal inconstancies
|
|
36
|
- Nag Hammadi Codex III
- Written 120-180 AD
- Manuscript written 4th century
- Number of manuscripts 1 Coptic
- Author unknown
- Witness tertiary or none (too late for 1° or 2°)
- Rejected by early church based on authorship and historical relevance
- Sayings consistent with John and Thomas
- Appears to be a baptismal instruction
|
|
37
|
- Fulda Manuscript 546 AD
- Written ? AD not mentioned until 4th century
- Manuscript written 546 AD
- Number of manuscripts 100 all Latin
- Paul identified as author
- Mentioned in Colossians 4:16
- Witness tertiary or none (too late for 1° or 2°)
- Never seen by early church
- Accepted by later church
- Included in many NT collections until 17th century
- Council of Florence (1439-43) excluded
|
|
38
|
- Seneca the younger 4 BC to 64 AD
- 8 epistles from Paul, 6 from Seneca
- Incerti Avctoris, Epistvlae S. Pavli et Senecae
- Written ? AD not mentioned until 4th century
- Manuscript written 14th century
- Number of manuscripts 1 Latin
- Paul and Seneca identified as authors
- Rejected by early church
- Writing not similar to Paul’s or Seneca’s
|
|
39
|
- Heidelberg manuscript
- Written 160 AD (according to Tertullian)
- Manuscript written 6th century
- Number of manuscripts at least 6 various
- Tertullian:
- Composed in honor of Paul by Asian presbyter
- Was convicted of imposture and fired
- Rejected by early church
- Historical issues
- Author known and refuted
- Mystic premise
|
|
40
|
- Numerous documents manuscripts unknown
- Written ? AD (not known until middle ages)
- Letters of Pilate and Herod
- The Epistle of Pontius Pilate
- The Report of Pilate the Governor
- The Report of Pontius Pilate
- The Trial and Condemnation of Pilate
- The Death of Pilate
- Manuscript written ?
- Number of manuscripts many
|
|
41
|
- Authors identified by text
- Not known by early church
- Archko docs claim manuscripts in Vatican
- Lack of historical evidence makes acceptance problematic
|
|
42
|
- Numerous documents manuscripts unknown
- Written ? AD (not known until middle ages)
- Manuscript written ?
- Number of manuscripts many
- Authors identified by text
- Not known by early church
- Archko docs claim manuscripts in Vatican
- Lack of historical evidence makes acceptance problematic
|
|
43
|
- Bibliographical test
- Without a manuscript it is impossible to use bibliographical test
- Lack of manuscript evidence of lack of relevance
- Note choices made in case of attributed NT documents – no disagreement
between most historians and choices
|
|
44
|
- Internal tests
- Internal contradictions unknown (no manuscripts)
- Cohesiveness and comprehensibility unknown (no manuscripts)
- Degree of the witness unknown
- Primary or secondary
- Geographically placed
- Chronologically present
|
|
45
|
- External test
- Substantive evidence in antiquity that these works were not accepted
due to:
- Historical issues
- Authorship not accepted
- Known Gnostic/mystic input (implies lack of evidence, 4° source)
- Documents may come to light
- If documents were substantive many would have fought to save and
protect
|
|
46
|
- Legal-Historical Tests
- Bibliographical – unknown
- Internal – unknown
- External – significant problems
|
|
47
|
- Worth reading
- Need the originals to draw any real conclusion on the historical
documents
- Significant bibliographical, internal and external issues
- Can clearly see why they are not on the same historical footing as the
Biblical Canon
|
|
48
|
- Documents in time
- Look at the historicity and general content
|