Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
The Historical Veracity of the New Testament Documents
  • Lecture 4 – Documents in Direct Support and Time 1: The Archko Volume and Apocryphal Gospels
2
The Archko Volume
  • Rev. W. D. Mahan of De Witt, Missouri
  • Visited by H. C. Whydamam of Germany 1856
    • Reported studying in the Vatican Library where among the 560,000 volumes there he found a record concerning Pilate
    • He produced a translation for Mahan
  • Through research, Mahan discovered potentially many similar documents in Vatican and Constantinople
3
The Archko Volume
  • In 1883, Mahan traveled to Rome and Constantinople
  • In the company of Dr. McIntosh and Dr. Twyman visited
    • The Vatican
    • The Jewish Talmuds at Constantinople
  • Discovered manuscripts and translated them with McIntosh and Twyman
4
Bibliographical Test
  • Bibliographical test
    • Vatican has the manuscripts and won’t affirm or deny (is known to hold back questionable or embarrassing documents)
    • Constantinople Talmunds are undiscovered
    • Number of manuscripts is unknown (at least one each)
    • Lapse between originals and manuscripts unknown (Mahan describes them as very old)
  • Bibliographical problems
5
Internal Test
  • No internal contradictions
  • They are cohesive and comprehensible
  • Degree of the witness
    • Primary or secondary
    • Geographically placed
    • Chronologically present
6
External Test
  • Nothing in any of the Archko documents is substantially contradicted by the report of
    • Any other document in antiquity
    • Any known archeological find
    • Some problems based on style and presentation (historically not considered a problem)

7
Legal-Historical Tests
  • Bibliographical – questionable
  • Internal – pass
  • External – pass


8
 
9
The Archko Volume
  • The Archeological Writings of the Sanhedrim and Talmuds of the Jews


  • Constantine’s letter in regard to having fifty copies of the Scriptures written and bound
  • Jonathan’s interview with the Bethlehem shepherds—Letter of Melker, Priest of the Synagogue at Bethlehem
  • Gamaliel’s interview with Joseph and Mary and others concerning Jesus


10
The Archko Volume
  • Report of Caiaphas to the Sanhedrim concerning the execution of Jesus
  • Report of Caiaphas to the Sanhedrim concerning the resurrection of Jesus
  • Valleus’s notes—”Acta Pilati,” or Pilate’s report to Caesar of the arrest, trial, and crucifixion of Jesus
  • Herod Antipater’s defense before the Roman Senate in regard to his conduct at Bethlehem


11
The Archko Volume
  • Herod Antipas’s defense before the Roman Senate in regard to the execution of John the Baptist
  • The Hillel letters regarding God’s providence to the Jews, by Hillel the Third


12
Talmuds (Mishna)
  • Constantinople documents
  • Sketch of the Talmuds
  • Documents of the Jewish people for instruction, training, study, and history
  • Critical documents for Jewish people
  • We will look at these in more detail later
13
External Proof
  • Reports to and from officials in the Roman Empire were as common then as they are today in any bureaucracy
  • Tertullian and Justin Martyr both speak of a report on the Crucifixion (not extant) sent in by Pilate to Tiberius, from which idea a large amount of apocryphal literature originated
  • Other reports are known to exist, but are not extant
14
Constantine’s Letter
  • Constantine’s letter in regard to having fifty copies of the Scriptures written and bound
  • General letter that supports a 327AD Latin version of the Bible
  • 50 copies produced in book form for the churches of the Empire
  • Eusebius referred to the letter and the copies, “Ever mindful of the welfare of those churches of God, the Emperor addressed me personally in a letter on the means of providing copies of the inspired oracles.”



15
Letter of Melker
  • Jonathan’s interview with the Bethlehem shepherds—Letter of Melker, Priest of the Synagogue at Bethlehem
  • Sanhedrim, 88 B. Order No. 2
  • Position of shepherds is interesting in the Mishna based on described incident
  • Letter of Melker - has some external test problems
  • Purports to describe many events around Jesus early life—doesn’t appear to be influenced by heretical gospels


16
Gamaliel’s Interview
  • Gamaliel’s interview with Joseph and Mary and others concerning Jesus
  • Descriptions of Joseph, Mary, Jesus, Mary and Martha sisters of Lazerus
  • Unflattering descriptions of Joseph and Mary
  • Gives credence to Gamaliel’s statements found in Acts 5
17
Caiaphas: Execution of Jesus
  • Report of Caiaphas to the Sanhedrim concerning the execution of Jesus
  • Caiaphas’ accusations
    • Knew the name of God
    • Atonement through repentance (metanoeite instead of kaphar)
    • Baptism (table) instead of circumcision
    • Communion (bread and wine in place of Passover)
    • Prophecy of the destruction of the Temple
    • Messianic claim of Godhood

18
Caiaphas: Execution of Jesus
  • Report of Caiaphas to the Sanhedrim concerning the execution of Jesus
  • Caiaphas’ acknowledgements
    • Healing miracles
    • Doctrine of Hillel
    • Teachings
    • Singular God; claimed to be God
    • Midrash teaching style
  • Notes the illegality under Jewish law of death pronounced without the Sanhedrim


19
Caiaphas: Resurrection of Jesus
  • Report of Caiaphas to the Sanhedrim concerning the resurrection of Jesus
  • Sanhedrim, 89 by Siphri II, 7
  • Witness of soldiers
  • John, Peter, Mary and Joanna
  • Jesus appearance to Caiaphas
  • Caiaphas’ resignation
  • Report on the execution is more believable
  • Report on the resurrection is questionable
20
Valleus’s Notes
  • Valleus Paterculus, Roman historian, works thought to be lost, but referenced by Priscian and Tacitus, contemporary of Christ
  • Known to have written Historia Romania – not extent
  • Notes found in the Vatican
  • Reports to have met Jesus
    • Heals, raises the dead
    • Dangerous as an army
    • Jews divided
21
Acts of Pilate
  • “Acta Pilati,” or Pilate’s report to Caesar of the arrest, trial, and crucifixion of Jesus
  • To Tiberius Caesar – correct title
  • Many details—likely too many
    • Pilate’s first sight of Jesus
    • Interview with Jesus
    • Too much introspection
  • Historically known that Pilate wrote a report to the Roman Senate—this is not likely it
22
Herod: Bethlehem
  • Herod Antipater’s defense before the Roman Senate in regard to his conduct at Bethlehem
  • Found in the Vatican
  • Negatively describes (proof of time/place)
    • Essenes
    • Priests
    • Sadducees
    • Pharisees
  • Refers to Melker and shepherds
  • Claimed took his actions to stop insurrection



23
Herod: John the Baptist
  • Herod Antipas’s defense before the Roman Senate in regard to the execution of John the Baptist
  • Records of the Roman Senate in the Vatican
  • To Tiberius and the Roman Senate (correct)
  • Herod’s defeat by Aretas, King of Arabia
  • Reason for defeat attributed by the Jews—beheading of John the Baptist
  • Herod’s response to this claim (reasonable)


24
Herod: John the Baptist
  • Herod’s accusations against John the Baptist
    • No authority
    • Changes God’s place of worship
    • Changes Jewish doctrines
    • Changes modes of application
  • Refers to Gamaliel, Hilderium, Shammai, and Hillel (key rabbinical leaders time/place)
  • Execution at leader’s request not dancing girl
  • Speaks of interview with Christ, other details
  • Compelling and believable


25
Hillel the Third
  • The Hillel letters regarding God’s providence to the Jews, by Hillel the Third (359 AD)
  • Nothing new, but a call to the Jewish people concerning the coming of the Messiah
  • Supports the concept of the Messianic Jews in the early church
  • Supports the idea of Christianity of the Jewish priests following the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD




26
Conclusions
  • Worth reading
  • Need the originals to draw any real conclusion on the historical documents
  • Some external issues


  • Can clearly see why they are not on the same historical footing as the Biblical Canon
27
Gospels
  • Luke 1:1-2
    • The author to Theophilus: many writers have undertaken to draw up an account of the events that have happened among us, following the traditions handed down to us by the original eyewitnesses and servants of the Gospel.
  • Many of these other accounts are called apocryphal
  • Just what is apocryphal?
28
Apocryphal
  • a·poc·ry·phal (ə-pŏk'rə-fəl) adj.
  • Of questionable authorship or authenticity.
  • Erroneous; fictitious: “Wildly apocryphal rumors about starvation in Petrograd . . . raced through Russia's trenches” (W. Bruce Lincoln).
  • Apocryphal Bible. Of or having to do with the Apocrypha.
  • apocryphally a·poc'ry·phal·ly adv.
  • Just how many are there?
29
Apocryphal Gospels
  • The Protevangelion (Infancy Gospel of James)
  • The First Infancy Gospel
  • Thomas’s Infancy Gospel
  • The Gospel of Nicodemus (The Acts of Pontius Pilate)
  • The Gospel of Peter
  • Signs Gospel
  • Gospel of Thomas
30
Apocryphal Gospels
  • Gospel of Mary
  • Secret Gospel of Mark
  • Egerton Gospel
  • Gospel Oxyrhynchus 840
  • Gospel Oxyrhynchus 1224
  • The Gospel of Judas



31
Apocryphal Gospels
  • Additional mentioned up to 400 AD
    • None are extant
    • The Gospel of Andrew
    • The Gospel of Apelles
    • The Gospel According to the Twelve Apostles
    • The Gospel of Barnabas
    • The Gospel of Bartholomew
    • The Gospel of Basilides
    • The Gospel of Cerinthus

32
Apocryphal Gospels
  • Additional mentioned up to 400 AD (cont)
    • The Gospel of the Ebionites
    • The Gospel of the Encratites
    • The Gospel of Eve
    • The Gospel according to the Hebrews
    • The False Gospel of Hesychius
    • The Gospel of Jude
    • The False Gospels (published by Lucianus)
    • The Gospel of Marcion

33
Apocryphal Gospels
  • Additional mentioned up to 400 AD (cont)
    • The Gospel of Matthias
    • The Gospel of Merinthus
    • The Gospel according to the Nazarenes
    • The Gospel of Perfection
    • The False Gospel of Peter
    • The Gospel of Philip
    • The Gospel of Scythianus
    • The Gospel of Titan
    • The Gospel of Thaddaeus

34
Apocryphal Gospels
  • Additional mentioned up to 400 AD (cont)
    • The Gospel of Truth
    • The Gospel of Valentinus
    • The Gospel According to the Egyptians

35
Gospels
  • 13 extant
  • 23 not extant but known in history
  • 36 known apocryphal Gospels
  • 4 historically accepted Gospels


  • 40 total known Gospels


  • Can there be any doubt that Jesus Christ radically affected the world


36
 
37
 
38
The Protevangelion
  • James’ Infancy Gospel
    • Written too late (140) for attribution to James
    • Too late (140) to be primary or secondary
    • Heretical incidents
      • Misbehavior by Jesus
      • Misuse of miracles
    • Rejected by early church
    • Popular in Middle Ages and Renaissance

39
The First Infancy Gospel
  • Arabic Infancy Gospel
    • Written too late for attribution to Caiaphas
    • Too late to be primary or secondary
    • Heretical incidents similar to Protevangelion
    • Rejected by early church
    • Popular in Middle Ages and Renaissance
    • Episodes copied by Mohammed in Qur'an

40
Thomas’s Infancy Gospel
  • Syrian Infancy Gospel
    • Written too late for attribution to Thomas (80)
    • Could be primary or secondary
    • Heretical incidents similar to Protevangelion
    • Rejected by early church
    • Popular in Middle Ages and Renaissance



41
The Gospel of Nicodemus
  • The Acts of Pontius Pilate
    • Written too late (200) for attribution to Pilate or Nicodemus
    • Too late to be primary or secondary
    • Rejected by early church based on authorship and historical relevance
    • Other bibliographical problems
    • Believed by some to be a reaction to the Acts of Pilate written in 311 (Eusebius)
    • Pilate did write a report (not extant)
42
The Gospel of Peter
  • 9 page Codex discovered in a Monk’s grave in 1886, small fragment Oxyrhynchus, Egypt
    • Written too late (70) for attribution to Peter
    • Could be primary or secondary
    • Rejected by early church based on authorship and historical relevance
      • Strongly anti-Semitic (Peter was a Jew)
      • Claims Herod as Jesus’ executioner
    • Other bibliographical problems (1 manuscript, 1 fragment)
43
Gospel of Peter
  • Origen refers to it in his Commentary on Matthew
  • Eusebius records negative opinion expressed by Bishop Serapion of Antioch after he read a copy of this apocryphal gospel:
    • ... most of it is indeed in accordance with the true teaching of the Savior, but some things are additions to that teaching, which items also we place below for your benefit.
    • Classifies Gospel of Peter as a heretical writing and refers to 'Docetists‘ sect
44
Signs Gospel
  • The “Q” (Quelle) of John’s Gospel
    • No extant manuscripts
    • No references in other documents
    • Reconstructed from “signs” in John’s Gospel
    • Modern “Turbingen” apocryphal construction
    • Has more support than “Q”
    • More basis than “Q”
    • Less basis than any actual document in history

45
Gospel of Thomas
  • Complete text discovered Nag Hammadi 1945, fragment Oxyrhynchus 1898
    • 114 sayings of Christ
    • Didymos Judas Thomas author (not apostle)
    • Could be primary or secondary
    • Rejected by early church based on authorship and historical relevance
      • Mystic
      • Gnostic heresy
    • Other bibliographical problems (2 manuscripts)
46
Gospel of Mary
  • Fragment discovered in 1896, Akhmim Codex, 3 known complete from 3rd and 5th C
    • Written too late (120) for attribution to any 1st century Mary
    • Cannot be primary or secondary
    • Rejected by early church based on authorship, historical relevance, and heretical positions
      • Mortality and the origin of mortality as a result of the demi-urge (Greek creation god)
      • Ascension of Jesus
      • Ascent of the soul (in accordance with gnosticism)
47
Secret Gospel of Mark
  • Morton Smith discovered letter (1958) of Clement (150? – between 211&216) to Theodore
    • Contained fragments of Secret Mark
    • Supported Smith’s controversial ideas
      • Jesus as homosexual
      • Church rewrote scripture to suit own purposes
    • Letter was conveniently lost and not found
    • Photographed by Smith
      • Writing similar to Smith’s
      • Indications of forgery
48
Egerton Gospel
  • Papyrus Egerton 2
    • Second oldest Gospel manuscript
    • Fragment
    • Author undetermined
    • Close to John, but independent of 4 synoptic
    • Possibly Signs Gospel, but doesn’t match
    • Bibliographical problems
      • Singular manuscript
      • Incomplete
49
Gospel Oxyrhynchus 840 & 1224
  • Oxyrhynchus 840
    • Fragment
    • Author undetermined
    • 5 short paragraphs on washing and spiritual cleanliness
  • Gospel Oxyrhynchus 1224
    • Fragment
    • Author undetermined
    • 4 sayings

50
Conclusions
  • Not historically acceptable documents
    • Notably fail bibliographical test or are fragments
  • Worth reading
    • Tell as much about early church as Dickens does about Victorian England

  • Can clearly see why they are not on the same historical footing as the Biblical Canon
51
Next Time
  • Heretical Gospels and the proposed Q document
  • Apocryphal works


  • Look at the historicity and general content