|
1
|
- Lecture 4 – Documents in Direct Support and Time 1: The Archko Volume
and Apocryphal Gospels
|
|
2
|
- Rev. W. D. Mahan of De Witt, Missouri
- Visited by H. C. Whydamam of Germany 1856
- Reported studying in the Vatican Library where among the 560,000
volumes there he found a record concerning Pilate
- He produced a translation for Mahan
- Through research, Mahan discovered potentially many similar documents in
Vatican and Constantinople
|
|
3
|
- In 1883, Mahan traveled to Rome and Constantinople
- In the company of Dr. McIntosh and Dr. Twyman visited
- The Vatican
- The Jewish Talmuds at Constantinople
- Discovered manuscripts and translated them with McIntosh and Twyman
|
|
4
|
- Bibliographical test
- Vatican has the manuscripts and won’t affirm or deny (is known to hold
back questionable or embarrassing documents)
- Constantinople Talmunds are undiscovered
- Number of manuscripts is unknown (at least one each)
- Lapse between originals and manuscripts unknown (Mahan describes them
as very old)
- Bibliographical problems
|
|
5
|
- No internal contradictions
- They are cohesive and comprehensible
- Degree of the witness
- Primary or secondary
- Geographically placed
- Chronologically present
|
|
6
|
- Nothing in any of the Archko documents is substantially contradicted by
the report of
- Any other document in antiquity
- Any known archeological find
- Some problems based on style and presentation (historically not
considered a problem)
|
|
7
|
- Bibliographical – questionable
- Internal – pass
- External – pass
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
- The Archeological Writings of the Sanhedrim and Talmuds of the Jews
- Constantine’s letter in regard to having fifty copies of the Scriptures
written and bound
- Jonathan’s interview with the Bethlehem shepherds—Letter of Melker,
Priest of the Synagogue at Bethlehem
- Gamaliel’s interview with Joseph and Mary and others concerning Jesus
|
|
10
|
- Report of Caiaphas to the Sanhedrim concerning the execution of Jesus
- Report of Caiaphas to the Sanhedrim concerning the resurrection of Jesus
- Valleus’s notes—”Acta Pilati,” or Pilate’s report to Caesar of the
arrest, trial, and crucifixion of Jesus
- Herod Antipater’s defense before the Roman Senate in regard to his
conduct at Bethlehem
|
|
11
|
- Herod Antipas’s defense before the Roman Senate in regard to the
execution of John the Baptist
- The Hillel letters regarding God’s providence to the Jews, by Hillel the
Third
|
|
12
|
- Constantinople documents
- Sketch of the Talmuds
- Documents of the Jewish people for instruction, training, study, and
history
- Critical documents for Jewish people
- We will look at these in more detail later
|
|
13
|
- Reports to and from officials in the Roman Empire were as common then as
they are today in any bureaucracy
- Tertullian and Justin Martyr both speak of a report on the Crucifixion
(not extant) sent in by Pilate to Tiberius, from which idea a large
amount of apocryphal literature originated
- Other reports are known to exist, but are not extant
|
|
14
|
- Constantine’s letter in regard to having fifty copies of the Scriptures
written and bound
- General letter that supports a 327AD Latin version of the Bible
- 50 copies produced in book form for the churches of the Empire
- Eusebius referred to the letter and the copies, “Ever mindful of the
welfare of those churches of God, the Emperor addressed me personally in
a letter on the means of providing copies of the inspired oracles.”
|
|
15
|
- Jonathan’s interview with the Bethlehem shepherds—Letter of Melker,
Priest of the Synagogue at Bethlehem
- Sanhedrim, 88 B. Order No. 2
- Position of shepherds is interesting in the Mishna based on described
incident
- Letter of Melker - has some external test problems
- Purports to describe many events around Jesus early life—doesn’t appear
to be influenced by heretical gospels
|
|
16
|
- Gamaliel’s interview with Joseph and Mary and others concerning Jesus
- Descriptions of Joseph, Mary, Jesus, Mary and Martha sisters of Lazerus
- Unflattering descriptions of Joseph and Mary
- Gives credence to Gamaliel’s statements found in Acts 5
|
|
17
|
- Report of Caiaphas to the Sanhedrim concerning the execution of Jesus
- Caiaphas’ accusations
- Knew the name of God
- Atonement through repentance (metanoeite instead of kaphar)
- Baptism (table) instead of circumcision
- Communion (bread and wine in place of Passover)
- Prophecy of the destruction of the Temple
- Messianic claim of Godhood
|
|
18
|
- Report of Caiaphas to the Sanhedrim concerning the execution of Jesus
- Caiaphas’ acknowledgements
- Healing miracles
- Doctrine of Hillel
- Teachings
- Singular God; claimed to be God
- Midrash teaching style
- Notes the illegality under Jewish law of death pronounced without the
Sanhedrim
|
|
19
|
- Report of Caiaphas to the Sanhedrim concerning the resurrection of Jesus
- Sanhedrim, 89 by Siphri II, 7
- Witness of soldiers
- John, Peter, Mary and Joanna
- Jesus appearance to Caiaphas
- Caiaphas’ resignation
- Report on the execution is more believable
- Report on the resurrection is questionable
|
|
20
|
- Valleus Paterculus, Roman historian, works thought to be lost, but
referenced by Priscian and Tacitus, contemporary of Christ
- Known to have written Historia Romania – not extent
- Notes found in the Vatican
- Reports to have met Jesus
- Heals, raises the dead
- Dangerous as an army
- Jews divided
|
|
21
|
- “Acta Pilati,” or Pilate’s report to Caesar of the arrest, trial, and
crucifixion of Jesus
- To Tiberius Caesar – correct title
- Many details—likely too many
- Pilate’s first sight of Jesus
- Interview with Jesus
- Too much introspection
- Historically known that Pilate wrote a report to the Roman Senate—this
is not likely it
|
|
22
|
- Herod Antipater’s defense before the Roman Senate in regard to his
conduct at Bethlehem
- Found in the Vatican
- Negatively describes (proof of time/place)
- Essenes
- Priests
- Sadducees
- Pharisees
- Refers to Melker and shepherds
- Claimed took his actions to stop insurrection
|
|
23
|
- Herod Antipas’s defense before the Roman Senate in regard to the
execution of John the Baptist
- Records of the Roman Senate in the Vatican
- To Tiberius and the Roman Senate (correct)
- Herod’s defeat by Aretas, King of Arabia
- Reason for defeat attributed by the Jews—beheading of John the Baptist
- Herod’s response to this claim (reasonable)
|
|
24
|
- Herod’s accusations against John the Baptist
- No authority
- Changes God’s place of worship
- Changes Jewish doctrines
- Changes modes of application
- Refers to Gamaliel, Hilderium, Shammai, and Hillel (key rabbinical
leaders time/place)
- Execution at leader’s request not dancing girl
- Speaks of interview with Christ, other details
- Compelling and believable
|
|
25
|
- The Hillel letters regarding God’s providence to the Jews, by Hillel the
Third (359 AD)
- Nothing new, but a call to the Jewish people concerning the coming of
the Messiah
- Supports the concept of the Messianic Jews in the early church
- Supports the idea of Christianity of the Jewish priests following the
destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD
|
|
26
|
- Worth reading
- Need the originals to draw any real conclusion on the historical
documents
- Some external issues
- Can clearly see why they are not on the same historical footing as the
Biblical Canon
|
|
27
|
- Luke 1:1-2
- The author to Theophilus: many writers have undertaken to draw up an
account of the events that have happened among us, following the
traditions handed down to us by the original eyewitnesses and servants
of the Gospel.
- Many of these other accounts are called apocryphal
- Just what is apocryphal?
|
|
28
|
- a·poc·ry·phal (ə-pŏk'rə-fəl) adj.
- Of questionable authorship or authenticity.
- Erroneous; fictitious: “Wildly apocryphal rumors about starvation in
Petrograd . . . raced through Russia's trenches” (W. Bruce Lincoln).
- Apocryphal Bible. Of or having to do with the Apocrypha.
- apocryphally a·poc'ry·phal·ly adv.
- Just how many are there?
|
|
29
|
- The Protevangelion (Infancy Gospel of James)
- The First Infancy Gospel
- Thomas’s Infancy Gospel
- The Gospel of Nicodemus (The Acts of Pontius Pilate)
- The Gospel of Peter
- Signs Gospel
- Gospel of Thomas
|
|
30
|
- Gospel of Mary
- Secret Gospel of Mark
- Egerton Gospel
- Gospel Oxyrhynchus 840
- Gospel Oxyrhynchus 1224
- The Gospel of Judas
|
|
31
|
- Additional mentioned up to 400 AD
- None are extant
- The Gospel of Andrew
- The Gospel of Apelles
- The Gospel According to the Twelve Apostles
- The Gospel of Barnabas
- The Gospel of Bartholomew
- The Gospel of Basilides
- The Gospel of Cerinthus
|
|
32
|
- Additional mentioned up to 400 AD (cont)
- The Gospel of the Ebionites
- The Gospel of the Encratites
- The Gospel of Eve
- The Gospel according to the Hebrews
- The False Gospel of Hesychius
- The Gospel of Jude
- The False Gospels (published by Lucianus)
- The Gospel of Marcion
|
|
33
|
- Additional mentioned up to 400 AD (cont)
- The Gospel of Matthias
- The Gospel of Merinthus
- The Gospel according to the Nazarenes
- The Gospel of Perfection
- The False Gospel of Peter
- The Gospel of Philip
- The Gospel of Scythianus
- The Gospel of Titan
- The Gospel of Thaddaeus
|
|
34
|
- Additional mentioned up to 400 AD (cont)
- The Gospel of Truth
- The Gospel of Valentinus
- The Gospel According to the Egyptians
|
|
35
|
- 13 extant
- 23 not extant but known in history
- 36 known apocryphal Gospels
- 4 historically accepted Gospels
- 40 total known Gospels
- Can there be any doubt that Jesus Christ radically affected the world
|
|
36
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
- James’ Infancy Gospel
- Written too late (140) for attribution to James
- Too late (140) to be primary or secondary
- Heretical incidents
- Misbehavior by Jesus
- Misuse of miracles
- Rejected by early church
- Popular in Middle Ages and Renaissance
|
|
39
|
- Arabic Infancy Gospel
- Written too late for attribution to Caiaphas
- Too late to be primary or secondary
- Heretical incidents similar to Protevangelion
- Rejected by early church
- Popular in Middle Ages and Renaissance
- Episodes copied by Mohammed in Qur'an
|
|
40
|
- Syrian Infancy Gospel
- Written too late for attribution to Thomas (80)
- Could be primary or secondary
- Heretical incidents similar to Protevangelion
- Rejected by early church
- Popular in Middle Ages and Renaissance
|
|
41
|
- The Acts of Pontius Pilate
- Written too late (200) for attribution to Pilate or Nicodemus
- Too late to be primary or secondary
- Rejected by early church based on authorship and historical relevance
- Other bibliographical problems
- Believed by some to be a reaction to the Acts of Pilate written in 311
(Eusebius)
- Pilate did write a report (not extant)
|
|
42
|
- 9 page Codex discovered in a Monk’s grave in 1886, small fragment
Oxyrhynchus, Egypt
- Written too late (70) for attribution to Peter
- Could be primary or secondary
- Rejected by early church based on authorship and historical relevance
- Strongly anti-Semitic (Peter was a Jew)
- Claims Herod as Jesus’ executioner
- Other bibliographical problems (1 manuscript, 1 fragment)
|
|
43
|
- Origen refers to it in his Commentary on Matthew
- Eusebius records negative opinion expressed by Bishop Serapion of
Antioch after he read a copy of this apocryphal gospel:
- ... most of it is indeed in accordance with the true teaching of the
Savior, but some things are additions to that teaching, which items
also we place below for your benefit.
- Classifies Gospel of Peter as a heretical writing and refers to
'Docetists‘ sect
|
|
44
|
- The “Q” (Quelle) of John’s Gospel
- No extant manuscripts
- No references in other documents
- Reconstructed from “signs” in John’s Gospel
- Modern “Turbingen” apocryphal construction
- Has more support than “Q”
- More basis than “Q”
- Less basis than any actual document in history
|
|
45
|
- Complete text discovered Nag Hammadi 1945, fragment Oxyrhynchus 1898
- 114 sayings of Christ
- Didymos Judas Thomas author (not apostle)
- Could be primary or secondary
- Rejected by early church based on authorship and historical relevance
- Other bibliographical problems (2 manuscripts)
|
|
46
|
- Fragment discovered in 1896, Akhmim Codex, 3 known complete from 3rd
and 5th C
- Written too late (120) for attribution to any 1st century
Mary
- Cannot be primary or secondary
- Rejected by early church based on authorship, historical relevance, and
heretical positions
- Mortality and the origin of mortality as a result of the demi-urge
(Greek creation god)
- Ascension of Jesus
- Ascent of the soul (in accordance with gnosticism)
|
|
47
|
- Morton Smith discovered letter (1958) of Clement (150? – between
211&216) to Theodore
- Contained fragments of Secret Mark
- Supported Smith’s controversial ideas
- Jesus as homosexual
- Church rewrote scripture to suit own purposes
- Letter was conveniently lost and not found
- Photographed by Smith
- Writing similar to Smith’s
- Indications of forgery
|
|
48
|
- Papyrus Egerton 2
- Second oldest Gospel manuscript
- Fragment
- Author undetermined
- Close to John, but independent of 4 synoptic
- Possibly Signs Gospel, but doesn’t match
- Bibliographical problems
- Singular manuscript
- Incomplete
|
|
49
|
- Oxyrhynchus 840
- Fragment
- Author undetermined
- 5 short paragraphs on washing and spiritual cleanliness
- Gospel Oxyrhynchus 1224
- Fragment
- Author undetermined
- 4 sayings
|
|
50
|
- Not historically acceptable documents
- Notably fail bibliographical test or are fragments
- Worth reading
- Tell as much about early church as Dickens does about Victorian England
- Can clearly see why they are not on the same historical footing as the
Biblical Canon
|
|
51
|
- Heretical Gospels and the proposed Q document
- Apocryphal works
- Look at the historicity and general content
|